The Exodus: History or Myth?
Moses commands the people to remember the day they came out of Egypt. Scripture records plainly that this was an event accomplished by the power of God. Yet the world would rather treat it as myth or literary imagination.
Scholars rest their case on the record of the building of the city of Rameses. On that basis they fix the Exodus in the reign of Rameses II, and because nothing from that period fits, they dismiss the Bible as myth. Yet the actual archaeological evidence (a settlement of foreigners, remains that appear to be the tomb of Joseph, Semitic names preserved in a list of slaves, a city abandoned in haste along with traces of burials, the writings of an Egyptian sage, and the Israel Stela) all points to the Middle Kingdom, an age earlier than that of Rameses. Having placed the event in the wrong period, they have then claimed there is no evidence for it.
Once the evidence is set in its proper period, it agrees remarkably with the biblical record. The suggestion that the Exodus be read not as history but only as metaphor and moral lesson is attractively packaged, nothing more. Take away the historical ground of Scripture, and the theological truths built upon it fall with it. The Exodus is a historical fact, planned from the time of God’s covenant with Abraham, and it is the foundation both of Israel’s identity and of knowing who God is.